I am in my early 50s, divorced and live across the country from my dad and older brother because of parenting custody laws in the state that I moved to when I was still married.
My older brother who is divorced too, cared for my mom before she passed 6 years ago and then moved into my dad's house and has cared for him 24/7 for the last 3 years.
During this time, my brother gave up a career that he enjoyed and has been absorbed further and further into dad's controlling and narcissistic ways.
Dad is 87 and has begun to fall at least once a week and become increasing confused. He is incontinent and absolutely will not agree to anyone coming into his home or going into any group type care. He could afford help and probably ALF but is bound and determined to stay in his home until they haul him out on a stretcher. Brother fully believes that if he set a deadline and left dad- he would be prosecuted by the law when Dad passes alone in the house.
Two years ago I had our family minister take dad to tour some assisted living homes nearby and dad completely refused to move. I've urged brother to hire a PT caregiver- he checked into this and then said, Dad's so difficult, no one would put up with him.
Recently, dad has had hernia surgery, recurring staph infections and fell in church and hit his head on the pew and paramedics had to take him to the ER where he needed 7 staples in the back of his head.
My brother believes he is in prison- counts the nights he sleeps on dad's couch and cries. Normally he is stoic, capable and very independent and now he appears to be in a severe depression. He did see a psychiatrist a few years ago but refuses to take any depression meds or get counseling for himself.
I told him I can fly out to visit next week and his response to me was "Absolutely not! I can't handle company at this time."
I am SO HURT that he now classifies me at COMPANY instead of his SISTER!
I am so hurt that he completely rebuffs any efforts I make to try to get them help, resources or set boundaries. I also feel guilty that I live so far away- I've been raising 3 kids the last 10 years on my own and work quite a bit to try to make ends meet since I am not getting child support any more and have not remarried.
Would appreciate your thoughts about what we are going through...
Then, if I need to go into care - like I said god forbid - then the house cannot be used for collateral. There is a reason for this.
When I first started work we didn't need health or retirement insurance we paid in weekly to a National Insurance. Elderly care was free. We got a pension when we reached 60 (65 for men) Now times they have changed. No longer can I retire at 60 I have to wait until 65 (hmm no comment from me on that one - I get weekly carers allowance of £61.25 and that is it I might add but when I reach 65 that stops) Elderly care is no longer free and the rising price of houses is something the government has seen it can tap into. So if you save all your life you have to pay for care; if you don't ever work (not because you can't but because you don't want to) and live off the state for your entire life you get free care and that rattles my cage! It appears to me, and I don't want to get into a political argument because this is the way I feel not how I expect others to see things, that all my life I played the game and paid into the system and now I am getting to the age where I expect to get some back I am being told NO because they changed the game rules - well no dice, I am taking my ball back and I am not playing.
BUT on the health side my directive stipulates that the ONLY people who may take care of me are professionals or people who are qualified in care. It also states that in the event that I have an illness which is either terminal or from which I will not recover or (but not limited to) dementia, to withhold food liquid and medication/medical attention other than pain relief (coward here when it comes to pain although to be fair I do have a very high pain threshold - I was asleep naturally when the nurses woke me to tell me to push because I had already delivered my daughter's head and they needed the shoulders through).
My children may visit me in care but not more than once a week. I absolutely do not want them to go through what I am going through and if the only way I can do it is through the law then so be it.
It is fundamentally wrong, in my opinion, to expect my children to care for me. Again in my opinion, my children should be living free and useful lives to support the state via taxes in the provision of care (like I said it's different in UK). What I do not want, and will not have, is my children feeling guilty for not being my caregiver (and I know neither could do caregiving nor do I want them to therefore I am not taking from them something they want) so I have acted beforehand and stepped in to that end.
Like I say I dont expect anyone to agree or disagree with me I am just telling you all how I see things on this side of the pond and as for changing my mind I won't so please don't try to make me - it would be a waste of time! Stubborn 'ornery cow on a mission here!!!!!
As a caregiver I am entitle to FEEL how I want - it is a fundamental human right. BUT if I act on my feelings via exclusivity, isolating a vulnerable parent, withholding care, medical evaluations, then it is indeed abuse, let alone physical emotional or religious abuses that occur regularly, the latter being things like offering non-Kosher food to someone who is an orthodox Jew or not getting them to see a minister/ priest/ Imam/ Rabbi or any other religious person I have not mentioned.
Where we differ is on the financial side. I maintain that it is wrong for an elder to expect a child to give up their access to essential funds (ie work) and to devote their time (100% of their time in some cases) without some sort of recourse to payment for that. Not every caregiver has the financial wherewithal to do that and it is perfectly reasonable to expect some remuneration whether it is in a weekly wage or some other means.
HOWEVER it is NOT OK for the caregiver to do so without a discussion and agreement on this (although this may have to be with a POA or guardian). It is NOT OK for them to help themselves for unreasonable expenses like buying a top of the range car to drive Mum about when a reliable second hand jalopy would have done or buying ridiculously priced shower gels because they prefer them when an off the shelf everyday one would have done.
After paying bills for several years and paying rent too I might add I now live rent free and mother pays for my food and for the transport I have for HER NEEDS - she refuses to get a taxi so she has to pay for the running of my car and I see that as reasonable. The only time I have sole use of it is when I go shopping or on a rare respite weekend and I pay for that. I use the money I get from the state to buy day to day things like a meal out for us or some sweets for her, I happen to like a particular brand of coffee so I buy that and it pays for my clothes etc. I invested 40K of my own money into a property that she has sole ownership of and I did so to keep her safe because she would not spend the money although she had it. I just think it is too too fraught with difficulty to generalise over caregiving and finances and feelings - we all have trodden different paths and our views are tainted by them - because we are human after all - well you all are...me I am definitely not human right now!!!!!!
At which point we will all just have to look after one another, using whatever resources we can lay our hands on. And maybe that wouldn't be so catastrophic, after all.
But meanwhile no one lives for free, and it's a mystery to me why it should ever be assumed that age alone exempts a person from responsibility for paying his way if he can.
He never said don't work or don't save we will give you everything. It was proposed that your savings would give you that bit extra when you retired, so Mum and Dad did just that
It isn't the age alone that rankles CM it's the fact that it's not a level playing field. I believe that if you work and spend all your money and of course you can, then it is unreasonable to expect the state to provide ....example:-
My Mum worked alongside a woman in exactly the same role as she had both were managers in their own right. Mum and Dad went without to buy a house - Dad worked two jobs just so we could have a holiday as children. The other woman and her husband who also had a good job lived in a council house (I dont know the equivalent in US but it is housing owned by the state and rented for quite a low price). They went abroad when people didn't; they went on cruises two or three times a year had expensive cars (which miraculously never got stolen or damaged). They have always had the best of everything and spent to the hilt. Now she lives in a nursing home and she doesn't have to pay for that either. However she did pay National Insurance (like we had a choice in the matter!)
In the same nursing home is a woman who has never worked nor has her husband - and I quote - he did work on the side and it saw us all right. This means he didn't pay tax on it he didn't pay NI on it and spent his whole life working hard at doing as little as possible. She too gets a free place in the home. If Mum wanted to go (and she doesn't) into the same home it would cost us 5-600 pounds a week and I think that that is shameful given what they gave up while others squandered their money or defrauded the state. There is no positive to having scrimped and saved - you have effectively saved it for the state to take it off you.
All I am saying (and I did promise I wouldn't get into this debate) is that keep the playing field level. It is for all or for none. At the moment if you have the money and can employ the accountants and lawyers you can circumvent the payments even though you can AFFORD BEYOND ALL DOUBT to pay for the care. the only saving grace in that is that you can't CHOOSE which care home you go to .
As always it is a rich and poor divide with the middle folk paying %age wise the most. Now I am going to remind myself that I am not going to debate this further...repeat Judith you are not going to debate this further ...yes I know I said that before but I'm not!!!! grins at CM
But I was talking about what you're saying, I know other people, on the other hand, who do have the money to hire the accountants/lawyers to put all their money in a trust, not just their house, to go into facility and not have to pay when they could easily afford to do so and this is after they've apparently spent a fair share going around the country playing golf.
But, now, he couldn't have done anything like take dad's money to go buy another car or anything like that; all he had access to of dad's was just what was in his checking account, but, oh, he did also use his money first to go in debt to buy himself a top of the line truck; well, maybe not quite but in light of his finances, yet, rather than something he could actually afford, especially when he'd already done that once and had it repossessed and it almost happened again when dad passed right before he got this one paid off and yes, he/they/him and his gf had to have the best of everything.
However, I understand what you're saying; dad actually had no knowledge that grandson was getting paid; he couldn't understand the concept of him needing it when he considered he was taking care of everything; not sure how it would have all worked had he really understood what was going on.
But, especially since grandson was getting paid, even if he didn't understand, I really think he should have been doing what he was wanting and he just wouldn't do it.
I will say, along the lines of the trust, for the veterans, though they're trying to change this, you can do that and go into facility cost-free immediately; that's what that guy did; for everybody else that has to be done more than 5 yrs. ahead of time - they do what they call a 5-yr. lookback to see if anything like that has been done and if so, they can still take the house and sell it to pay for your expense of care but not until after you've passed away but that isn't done until you actually go into a facility for care but the putting it into trust the contract saying you can stay there is called a "life estate" over here; that's what my fil had done for my mil for when he passed away; sometimes it's drawn up in such a way that it only applies if you do actually stay in the house; other times, as in our case, that wasn't actually put in, so she still has it even though she's remarried and moved out, so even though the house is deeded to her daughter - and there's more, like was gotten into on another post on here - and she's rented it out, even though mil doesn't like that, though not sure why and since she has the life estate she has the authority to not allow it, although not sure she realizes it - if she ever has to go to care - which is something the kids are beginning somewhat to be concerned about with things that are happening, although think it's more from thinking they don't know what they would do because they're seeing it as her not having anything, since they think they do and they think they couldn't afford to give it up - they would come after that property since technically it's still hers; it only has the life estate; it's not in a trust or anything; don't think they understood enough about that, although the attorney should have, I would have thought but maybe not; he wasn't an elder law one but think he should have referred him to one; maybe he didn't even know enough to do that.
She does still get fil's pension even though she's remarried; you didn't used to be able to do that; she watched her older sister go through that; she wouldn't ever marry the man she lived with for that reason; not sure what she would have done had that still been the case, don't think she would have just lived with this man - though they're not quite, she has a used to be friend who seems to be doing something very similar and we know somebody else seems to be the same way but at least she didn't have to deal with that.
So, now, Jude, with you having put that in your directive, you can do that and with everything else you've done financially, they would have to do that, for free? the whole withholding food was part of the comfort care I ended up putting dad on that really did upset grandson but he wasn't eating anyway; I'm assuming that's the situation you're talking about, right?
wow, in some ways though, that might have been a relief to grandson; he had a really hard time seeing dad like he was; and, maybe if he'd actually done that, to me, too, but as it was, I pretty much just stayed with him all the time. Would you actually not want to be with your mom?
To go back, grandson wasn't working anyway when all this started with him taking care of dad; actually, in some ways, though I hate to say it, he was like that husband you were talking about that worked on the side, but, though, in all fairness, there were some other circumstances that had led to that being the case; it wasn't really the way he wanted it and things seemed to have changed now that he is paying in; he really, before, didn't expect to live that long but the longer he's lived the more I think he thinks it just might be possible and he won't have what dad had; he's not a veteran and now wouldn't be able to be, not that I expect that program to still be that viable then anyway, like what you're saying's happening over there; happening here, too. But I'm trying to think the same way you are, about me, is he going to want to do that for me; am I going to want him to but how do you define illness, what if it's not an actual illness you have but just the normal aging process? how would that be handled?
I believe the hospitals here have a real chance of causing the death of one of us. The Mayo Clinic already forced my husband into retirement. He had avascular necrosis of the hip. The "triage" doctor (a new system it was trying to safe costs I presume) insisted he do exercise for lower back pain. But his pain was excruciating and eventually, though only really about 11 months, his hip collapsed and we went to Ghent, Belgium for a hip replacement since Mayo acted like it was a normal event and wanted its $45,000 cash up front. We are trying to get back home to California and have been since 2005 but it is my stepfather who is standing in the way. He's already told me he considers his life over, why stand in our way? We did this relocation because my Mother wanted her husband to accept early retirement and both of them move down to Florida. He wasn't doing it. So my husband God bless him gave the okay to sell our ocean view home, leave our friends for a few years and work on getting my Mother settled. (My husband was an international business consultant with clients in China, Hong Kong and Europe. His basic needs were a telephone, a computer and a reasonably close distance to an international airport. Now, thanks to Mayo he has two replaced hips and one knee replacement. When doctors give him the go-ahead he will have foot reconstruction surgery. I just pray we'll be in California then.
As to the original poster she has little leg to stand on, IMHO, and in that regard I am firmly with irishboy. She could have left her kids with friends AT ANY POINT IN TIME if she were worried about her brother's sole care-giving role. When my brother and SIL (I love them both, he had three major stomach surgeries due to surgical error while her life was saved two decades ago by a heart transplant at OSU) visit to see my Mother I have extra work. Even telling them how to do things can be a real pain in the a--. My brother asks things like how thick should I slice her pizza. It makes you crazy. But at least this time i made it clear that having had rotator cuff surgery I would not be offering them any gourmet meals! (I learned my lesson last visit when they stayed with us. So did they. They stayed at a very nice beach restaurant and left for its comforts whenever they felt like it. Same thing for my stepfather; he does sometimes help with my Mother because i have three bad discs but he's kept their apartment and off he goes whenever he feels like it. Mostly I'm glad when he walks out the door. My husband and I haven't had a vacation, unless time in a hospital bed counts, since 2004.) My brother and I have both worked through our savings and our retirement funds, though I am worse off than he), and yet my stepfather, who literally didn't have a cent when he married my Mother 30 years ago, is awash in cash that was consistently put away for a rainy day by my Mother, while he's the cheapest man God ever made. If he spends $100 a month on her it's a miracle. I finally made him contribute to food costs because they have gone up so much; and my Mother bless her heart, has a singularly great appetite, especially for chicken and steak.
God bless you all and I hope one day we can have a place to write about how, all things considered, we wouldn't have wanted it nor would we have done it any other way!
Legal and other resources do NOT alway intervene in such situations. Elder parents can become like domestic abuse victims and or are over medicated, isolated, child like and trusting, narcissistic and abusive themselves. Sometimes greedy, self vested, and ill equipted siblings take advantage of all of this and really concerned family member can be LEGALLY shut out from changing that alone.
Elderly are prime abuse victims on all levels. Do not assume they do not have circumstances barring them from "helping". Caregivers need help when this level of resentment surfaces, irregardless of what they perceive the real situation to be.
You, had one situation,however perspective is everything and even your situation may not be exactly what your mind from YOUR perspective tells you it was.
This is a massive "black hole issue"that need light abd legislation shed on it. Elders are isolated, takenadvantage of and yes, legally murdered every day on the US. Biggest offenders? Family members.
I think she is wise to be concerned, yet she has been shredded for her concern?
Wrong move from site input. Resentful caregivers make huge mistakes and them blame trying to intervene siblings input or concern. What a mess some caregivers bring on themselves then bad mout their own siblings concern. Such defensiveness needs looked into. Caregiver Self fullfilling huge mistake going on here..
It is a very common situation, as seen on this board.
The brother has been carrying the FULL LOAD. Now she is concerned?????
Very few here are the least bit "open" to diversifide curcumstances of the many of us in that situation. A multitude of issues surface in these situations legal and otherwise. Not everyone's issues are the same. Some very resentful folks need to realize that and deal with their anger and resentment n healthier ways than attacking concerned family members input or questions. Concern and caring manifests in all forms. I believe the original poster explained her circumstances, and elderly issues are progressive and anyone that comes to aide at any time and in any way should be respected and appreciated and helped, not attacked.
Geeze, step out of your resentment shoes, Irishboy.
I was there every step of the way..he has issues AND greed. But he can be a jerk based on one wrong legal move on my parents part.
Do I stop caring, no.
Having elderly patents (or any caregiving situation) can become very complex.
Mine certainly is. I apologize for my anger. But I know people need support for these complicated circumstances that can arise.
Just because someone is circumstantially unable to pack up and move in, to physically care for their loved one..doesnt and shouldnt exclude them from concern or a diffetent way of caring..long distance or otherwise.
I live ten minutes or less from parents, am willing to share care and cost..but loafer brother is terridied he can no longer "free ride" off parents and has wrecked family with his issues.
That doesnt and shouldnt put me or anyone elses care or concern in the garbage.
How did your husband get necrosis? are you saying he had the therapy first and that's what caused it and Mayo said it was normal but they would do a hip replacement but only for cash, since they couldn't justify it medically? that's what they said my dad had, of his foot. And also they ended up saying that's what my little granddaughter got. Not sure what you mean by "triage" doctor; that's a term I normally only hear re the ER but know that mom was sent to therapy for her hip as well, but only because her primary physician's nurse saw what shape she was in and got the doctor to at least do that, so not sure if that helped it get to the point of bone on bone that when she went to her chiropractor for her back, he also saw what shape she was in and did x-rays and found it, so she finally was able to at least see the surgeon without a referral from her primary, who wouldn't give her one, and be told she definitely needed a hip replacement but that he would have to get a medical clearance from her primary, who still wouldn't do it, until she fractured it and fell or the other way around, as I'm sure you've heard often happens. At first I thought you meant you were still in Germany; wish I'd thought of that, or they had, and done that; never even thought; how did you? well, wait, think I got it later. But you've been trying to get back home for 10 yrs.?! Not sure I really understand what the hold up is. But I didn't think Mayo did his hip. What happened to his foot?
I haven't heard you say anything about kids, but I did all that I did with one, but I'm still not convinced frustratedsis either had friends or had ones she could leave her kids with or that she could have with her custody situation; I just don't think we know enough about her situation to say that but I'm also not sure she was worried about her brother's sole caregiving role at that point; I think things were still, or at least seemed to be, going fine then. It seems, maybe because you're female? that you don't mind your brother and sil coming, even if it does make extra work, while he just can't see taking that on; not sure dad's grandson would have had it not been for his girlfriend. Though one problem I, at least had with it was they wanted to do for dad on their schedule, not his, not sure how you handle that with your mom and they didn't like me saying anything about so I just tried to do it myself but they didn't like that either but they then did start doing it more on his schedule, just not following it themselves, which I guess is okay but then, at least to begin with - it wasn't what dad wanted so in some ways I still did or at least, and I can somewhat understand, they didn't want to be told any different but then she wound up having neck surgery, I think it was, so I'm not really sure what happened because I was back dealing with my granddaughter by then, who had ended up having a temporary surgery, while still being listed for transplant but getting worse and not getting one, till it was getting to the point of needing to do what her doctor, but not the local hospital, said was her only hope, which was to have her lifeflighted all the way to Boston for major open heart surgery, basically just as girlfriend was getting discharged and be having to have therapy, while dad was ending up back in the hospital as well, so at least for then it worked out but it was just a hard time but she did recover and got to where she did start cooking gourmet meals! just not what he liked. Though I think they would have liked for me to stay in the local motel, and, honestly, with the way they were, I might not have minded having somewhere to go, but with everything with the granddaughter being 2 hrs. away, I just couldn't afford so they just had to put up with me; sorry, like said, I tried to work myself rather than be extra work. So did your stepfather move after all? because I thought you said he wouldn't move to Florida, is where I thought you said she wanted to move to but they have an apt.? then I thought you're saying that's where you are but you were in California? In many ways, though, it was good that it was grandson taking care of dad because it wasn't any problem for him, just because of the size difference, even with the back problems he says he has. But that wasn't something that was an issue that often. So you've been taking care of your mother since 2004; do you not feel you can go off when your brother comes; that's what grandson would do when I'd go stay with dad. I thought your husband was still working; grandson did give up his income to take care of dad, but, thankfully, he was a veteran, so we got him the pension to get paid some to do it. So did your step-father not work?
My dad was somewhat that way after he got to where he couldn't work, with not wanting to spend or even thinking about anything being needed. They actually wound up going to the food pantries for food to eat, until they changed the rules and they couldn't anymore. He could live on beans and what was in the freezer, while mom liked to have a little more; he had it; she just would have to finally get it out of him, I guess kinda like you with him, though, of course, don't quite understand your whole situation.
I am also a member of an email group where we are somewhat doing just that as our ones that we were taking care of are passing on - was going to address some of the other issues but life is moving on for today anyway so will see
We may read and think we understand but we really don't. This is why I say please offer guidance help and support for people who are finding the path difficult but want to do their best whether it has come late to them or not.
Caregivers and past caregivers have both a lot to offer as long as it is supportive. So come on peeps lets pull together here instead of the unpleasantness I am seeing xxx.
What I feel essentially wrong with this situation is the utter disbelief that anyone can "take care" or show care unless they are physically there.
This belief system can cause huge problems in actually pulling together with the resources everyone has to manage care as a family refusing to become poloriazed, as realistically most siblings cannot just "drop everything"as much as they may want to.
I see a common stalemate with the opposite end and extremes the do it all vs the do nothings.
I also see "locked in " belief systems" really affecting caregivers and those "shut out".
Not every situation is fixable, true but many are. The thing to do is to get people less polarized, more into, doing what they can. Not in a damned if you do damned if you dont situation.
In this thread a woman is being typecast as not caring because she isnt physically there. Wrong. She wants to be there yet is being denied access.
Wrong.
This is the issue. Catch 22, she has tried to help in ways she can, and was rebuffed. Who wouldnt just give up?
This woman didnt and shouldnt. There are red flags all over and to me it is easy to see the real problem. Caregiver in trouble and yes, he has brought some of that on himself by negating "solutions".Or working with realities that HE is losing his capacity to cope. Perhaps a mature person could see that. He cannot.
Being on both sides of this issue myself, I know the dynamics. This is Not a job for one person. Ever. 1 stubborn person can negate the help he/she might have gotten for relief if he/she could think outside the guilt, I can do it all box.
Just like people think parenting is a snap, until they have kids. Uh ,no.
People that have NEVER cared for someone arent always prepared for the down and dirty of actually doing it. There is no job training but on the job.
You cannot assume that just because someone is PHYSCIALLY THERE, that they are doing a good job of it. Some do many dont, but are too proud, or have their eye on the prize(parents home or stuff) to admit it.
It can get very heated, to get real about what is really involved.
My Dad, had a horrible situation, and hospice was threatening to stop coming due to it, but brother let his pride get in the way of a solution. Just wouldnt hear anyones input at all.
Nor did HE do anything toward the goal of actually caring for Dad passed the end of his own self vested misguided nose.
Pride ruled the day. That didnt help our Dad one bit.And destroyed ALL goodwill in the family.
But suppose what I really appreciated was her, hm, relationship? with me, as in looking to me as at least one who did care even though I wasn't the one who was physically there. She understood about having other responsibilities other places.
And did not see me as doing nothing just because I wasn't there, just as she also didn't see him as doing everything just because he was. But she was also very good at gradually getting him to do more that needed to be done if he was going to be there. But definitely not to make him feel like there was no point in him being there at all.
I do feel like I may have come across the other way because of bringing up the times I did go but there were definitely times I didn't feel I could and I'm so grateful she understood that because there were times I was when grandson definitely didn't want me to; he never actually denied me coming; actually he'd call and want me to come; he just wouldn't want to stay as long as I did when I did go, which not sure if that's quite the same thing or not.
But still I wasn't just staying; I was staying until certain things were worked out that she understood but he didn't, like getting the home health care arranged when he came out of the hospital; could he have done it? maybe.
Should I have let him? what about when it wasn't getting done like it was supposed to be?
Do I just walk away from my dad? what about when it turns out the home health agency sends what turns out to be a social worker but under another guise, truly, was that deliberate or just a coincidence? She supposedly was there just to set up telemetry but they send out a social worker for that? Especially when there'd already been issues at the hospital with the social worker there not wanting to send him home with him being the caregiver - do you not think they might have talked with them and told them? Especially since he was only allowed to on a trial basis? But yet he tells me that she tells him that I'm the problem? While she's telling me that she'll put me in the same role as the housekeeper does; in other words that she'll make sure to report to me?
And, yes, I can imagine how it must feel to be on the other side. But it was somewhat because of what had happened in the hospital; it definitely took more than one person there; that's why I stayed there and, no, don't believe he would have if I hadn't it; he didn't see it necessary but then he also didn't like the way they were handling it either but also he didn't even want to handle it initially if it stayed that way when he came home; they didn't even want to let him come home at all because of it; that was the real reason for the trial, to see how he was going to do. And I do think you've hit; the issue is guilt, now guilt for what, not being able to do it all, but why such an issue....
He was shocked when he came into the hospital room and saw what was needing to be done but he blamed them for it. He never expected to have to be doing that.
So the issue was how was he going to handle it, now that just being there was possibly no longer going to be enough? Would he do or be able to and if not, would he say so or be too proud to or, yes, in his case, once he'd been, he felt, basically forced into being that, want dad's house too much to, which found out he did badger dad to give him; just that he never would.
Know how heated he got after dad was gone about it; I wonder how heated he got with dad in trying to get him to do it before.
I didn't know that hospice could and would actually quit but I do know that had things gone differently his housekeeper, that I still stay in touch with, just finally really leveled with me and told me she was getting ready to report him; she had just hated to. Not really sure what got through to him but think she must have finally; maybe she even told him.
But he did start doing more; it was just way too little, way too late.
He wanted to just be there, nothing more. Dad wound up being severely disappointed in having him come but that's where I just don't know at that point what we would have done. Do know it's created some real issues.
People would be shocked outta their socks at the blatant abuses and cruelty that were going on. Could I stop any of it? Believe me I tried, but he had POA, and clearly my mother had been convinced by him ( probably by threats to abandon her ( and he backed this up by doing it to Dad first) in a horrible, uninvestigated nursing home.
I. was smack in the middle of an expensive and animosity filled divorce from a 37 year marriage, and had a CHILD of 16 at home needing me, her parent,to care for too.
I stood to find myself homeless due to divorce issues that insisted be given my sole attention and my older girls were having babies and needed me AND Irishboy, I had a child at 41! That is really not unusual nowdays at all.
So does this mean I didnt love or care for my Dad. No. I was very involved in spite of my own immediate and concerning issues. Spent tons of my own money and had been through out parents elder years before they got old and ill. I had little to spare after divorce, yet still spent as brother wouldnt part with a dime, parents supported him the majority of his adult life FREE.
Of course I will get my dander up to anyone making uneducated assumptions about others. Been there done that.
I can clearly see (as would anyone who read up on these issues) polarizing based on faullty and inexperienced or immature typecasting and assumptions as it serves serves no one. Chastizing based on one frame of reference is rude, mean, counter productive and polarizing.
We all have our stories and all love our parents. Nuff said.
And yes, there comes a point where there is choice. To be mature, adult and realistic. You cannot avoid this forever. It IS the fundamental issue. It is fraught with choices and options, and frankly if you are resenting it that much or your siblings time to step back and see if YOU, your guilt or pride or caketaker burnout are somehow related to the issues.
Now am I attacking anyone here, no. But many times it is done. Last minute will changes.sense of entitilement, elder fears due to confusion or loss of memory etc. It is VERY real.
I certainly understand the never ending costs for eldercare or how picking up incidentals, gas to drs etc occur and the elders resources may be tapped if the have any to spare to balance out these costs, BUT. Some caretakers feel super entitled and do begin to lose sight of whose money it is etc. It happens.
And yes. There are many children who get off doing NOTHING,yet show up with hand out at will time.
Unfortunately there is lots of middle ground here too. To assume the worst in others is fraught with problems. To overelevate self, is also damgerous.
We never know ALL Circumstances, but POA is way overrated and families go on long after parents pass.
People really need to grow up quick in these circumstance. Elder care is a time bomb ticking as baby boomers (me) are getting there now. It is going to be the issue and it needs much more done to lessen the impact of the current problems their children will face.
One issue clearly is government mandates that elders 70 and over MUST withdrawl all savings before age 70. Many elders that planned well and are expecting to live off the interest of their savings cannot survive long if they have to withdrawl all interest earning monies.
Another is being forced into medicad by such legislation and current hospital and hospice policies.
We are trashing all options to the elder and their families to survive old age, their healthy financial and physical survival in their sr years.
In Tx there are things besides trust funds that protect elders life savings and homes. The are not well advertised, but essential to allow elders good care, and not to become or force their families into destitution.
Lets put our anger in letters to our represenatives to make elder issues more pallative to all.